Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Tessera, Inc v. Micron Technology Inc et al, No. 2:05-cv-00094 (E.D. Tex. July 14, 2005)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:05-cv-00094, Dkt. No. 80
Decided
July 14, 2005
Judge
Leonard Davis, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION and Order granting in part and denying in part defts partial motion to dismiss Counts III and IV of Tessera, Inc's Amended complaint for lact of Antitrust Standing without prejudice
Length
8 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is M icron Technology, Inc.’s, Micron Semiconductor Products, Inc.’s, Infineon Technologies Ag’s, Infineon Technologies Richmond, LP’s, and Infineon Technologies North American Corp.’s (collectively “Defendants”) Partial Motion to Dismiss Counts III and IV of Tessera, Inc.’s (“Tessera”) Amended Complaint for Lack of Antitrust Standing (Docket No. 27). Having fully considered the parties’ written submissions, the Court GRANTS in part and DENIES in part Defendants’ motion without prejudice to refile as a motion for summary judgment.