Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Connectel, LLC v. Cisco Systems Inc, No. 2:04-cv-00396 (E.D. Tex. July 6, 2006)

Granted in Part
Discovery Motion to Strike
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:04-cv-00396, Dkt. No. 168
Decided
July 6, 2006
Judge
Leonard Davis, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER - Court Grants in part and denies in part ConnecTel's motion to compel and denies ConnecTel's motion to strike
Length
5 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court are ConnecTel’s motions to compel (Docket No. 114) and to strike (Docket No. 132). As stated at the hearing, the Court GRANTS in part and DENIES in part the motion to compel. Cisco is to produce a Rule 30(b)(6) witness for up to six hours of deposition testimony on the topics discussed at the hearing. Also as stated at the hearing, the Court DENIES ConnecTel’s motion to strike for the reasons below. BACKGROUND When ConnecTel brought this suit, it alleged that over 100 Cisco products infringed the 120 claims of United States Patent Nos.

Download Opinion (PDF)

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error

Other documents in this case