Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Connectel, LLC v. Cisco Systems Inc, No. 2:04-cv-00396 (E.D. Tex. Apr. 12, 2006)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:04-cv-00396, Dkt. No. 115
Decided
April 12, 2006
Judge
Leonard Davis, J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION - the Court interprets the claim language in this case in the manner set forth herein. Claims with the disputed terms in bold are set forth in Appendix A, the Court's claim interpretations are set forth in a table as Appe…
Length
24 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

All colum n and line references are to the ‘307 patent.1 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION § CONNECTEL, LLC § Plaintiff § § vs. § § CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. § Defendant § CASE NO. 2:04-CV-396 MEMORANDUM OPINION This Memorandum Opinion construe s the terms in United States Patent N os. 6,016,307; 6,144,641; 6,454,594; and 6,473,404. BACKGROUND The ‘307 patent issued January 18, 2000. The ‘641 patent, a continuation of the ‘307 patent, issued November 7, 2000.