Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Avid Identifications Systems v. Phillips Electronics North America Corp et al, No. 2:04-cv-00183 (E.D. Tex. Feb. 11, 2009)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:04-cv-00183, Dkt. No. 470
Decided
February 11, 2009
Judge
T. John Ward, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER denying motion #457 and #462 as set forth herein
Length
5 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Avid Identification Syst ems, Inc.’s (“Avid”) Unopposed Motion For Reconsideration of the Court’s Order of Ine quitable Conduct (Docket Entry #457) and related papers. In its motion, plaintiff Avid moves the Court under Rule 60( b) to reconsider the Court’s inequitable conduct finding related to Avid’s U.S. Patent No. 5,235,326 (“the ‘326 patent”). (Docket Entry #427).