Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Avid Identifications Systems v. Phillips Electronics North America Corp et al, No. 2:04-cv-00183 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 28, 2007)

Granted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:04-cv-00183, Dkt. No. 427
Decided
September 28, 2007
Judge
T. John Ward, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION AND ORDER - for the reasons discussed herein, the court grants dfts motion 377 and declares US Patent No 5,235,326 unenforceable
Length
9 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

1. Introduction Datamars SA (“Datamars”) and The Crystal Import Corporation (“Crystal”) (collectively, “the defendants”), have filed a motion (#377) to render U.S. Patent No. 5,235,326, which is assigned to the plaintiff, Avid Identification Systems, Incorporated (“Avid”), unenforceable for inequitable conduct. For the reasons discussed herein, the court grants the defendants’ motion (#377) and declares U.S. Patent No. 5,235,326 unenforceable. 2.