Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

The Rockfeller University et al v. Centocor, Inc et al, No. 2:04-cv-00168 (E.D. Tex. June 13, 2006)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:04-cv-00168, Dkt. No. 139
Decided
June 13, 2006
Judge
T. John Ward, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION & Order - the court has carefully considered the parties written submission and hereby denies 92 Abbotts motion based on Noele v. Lederman and carries 93 with the case Abbotts Motion based on Chiron v. Genentech
Length
7 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Cou rt a re tw o M otions f or Sum mary Ju dgment file d b y De fendant A bbott Laboratories (“Abbott”) based on separate Federal Circuit cases – the first, Noele v. Lederman (#92); the second, Chiron v. Genente ch (#93). The Court has c arefully considered the par ties’ written submissions and hereby denies Abbott’s Motion based on Noele v. Lederman and carries with the case Abbott’s Motion based on Chiron v. Genentech. I.