Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

The Rockfeller University et al v. Centocor, Inc et al, No. 2:04-cv-00168 (E.D. Tex. Oct. 3, 2005)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:04-cv-00168, Dkt. No. 73
Decided
October 3, 2005
Judge
T. John Ward, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER - regarding parties' claim construction disputes as set forth herein
Length
14 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

The cou rt issues th is m emorandum o pinion a nd or der t o r esolve the pa rties’ c laim construction disputes. 1. Introduction The plaintiffs, The Rockefeller University (“Rockefeller”) and Chiron Corp. (“Chiron”) , claim the defendants, Centocor, Inc. (“Centocor”) and Abbott Laboratories (“Abbott”), infringe United States Patent Nos. 6,309,640 (“ the ‘640 pa tent”) a nd 6,419,927 (“the ‘927 pate nt”) (collectively “the patents-in-suit”). The parties filed claim construction briefs and the court held a Markman hearing.