Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

02 Micro Int'l v. Beyond Innovation, et al, No. 2:04-cv-00032 (E.D. Tex. July 10, 2009)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:04-cv-00032, Dkt. No. 610
Decided
July 10, 2009
Judge
Charles Everingham IV, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER - (see order for details)
Length
6 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

O2 Micro International Ltd., (“O2 Micro”) filed its original complaint on January 20, 2004, accusing the defendants, Beyond Innovation Technology Co. Ltd. (“BiTEK”), FSP Technology Inc., FSP Group (collectively, “FSP”), and Lien Chang Electronic Enterprise Co. Ltd. (“Lien Chang”), of infringing various cl aims of U.S. Patent Nos. 6,259,615 (“the ‘615 patent”), 6,396,722 (“the ‘722 patent ”), and 6,804,129 (“the ‘129 patent”). 1 Originally, the Honorable T. John Ward presided over the case.