Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

02 Micro Int'l v. Beyond Innovation, et al, No. 2:04-cv-00032 (E.D. Tex. Oct. 29, 2008)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:04-cv-00032, Dkt. No. 523
Decided
October 29, 2008
Judge
T. John Ward, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER denying motion to stay litigation
Length
5 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Pending before the court is Defenda nt Beyond Innovation Technology Co., Ltd.’s (“BiTEK”), Motion to Stay Litigation (Docket Entry No. 511) and related briefing. Defendants FSP Technology, Inc. and FSP Group have joined BiTEK’s motion (Docket Entry No. 518). Defendants request the Court to stay this litigat ion pending reexaminations of the U.S. Patent Nos.