Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Cummins-Allison Corp v. Glory Ltd, et al, No. 2:03-cv-00358 (E.D. Tex. Dec. 12, 2005)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:03-cv-00358, Dkt. No. 154
Decided
December 12, 2005
Judge
T. John Ward, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER denying #129 motion for summary judgment of non-infringement for claims 35-30
Length
9 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendants’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment of Non- infringement of United States Patent No. 5,692,067 (#129). The Court has carefully considered the parties’ written submissions and hereby grants-in-part and denies-in-part Defendants’ Motion. I. Introduction Cummins-Allison Corp. (“Cummins”) accuses Glory’s GRF-S60, GFR-S80, GFR-S80V, and GFR-S90V (“S-Machines”) of infringing claims 7-8, 10-11, 23-24, 35-40, 42, 44-47, 55-59, 61, 63-66, and 74-75 of U.S. Patent No. 5,692,067 (“the ‘067 patent”).