Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Cummins-Allison Corp v. Glory Ltd, et al, No. 2:03-cv-00358 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 22, 2005)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:03-cv-00358, Dkt. No. 122
Decided
August 22, 2005
Judge
T. John Ward, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER denying Glory's motion for partial summary judgment of invalidity for public use
Length
10 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment of Invalidity for Public Use as to certain claims of United States Patent No. 5,692,067 (“the ‘067 patent”). For reasons more fully set out below, the Court DENIES Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment. I. Introduction Defendants Glory Ltd., Glory Shoji Co., Ltd., and Glory (U.S.A.), Inc. (hereinafter “Glory”) filed a motion for summary judgment on March 21, 2005 based on alleged public use of the claimed invention of the ‘067 patent prior to May 19,1991.