Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Charles E Hill Assoc v. Amazon.com Inc, et al, No. 2:02-cv-00186 (E.D. Tex. Jan. 19, 2006)

Denied
Summary Judgment Infringement
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:02-cv-00186, Dkt. No. 467
Decided
January 19, 2006
Judge
See opinion
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION & ORDER at issue are the three Motion for Summary Judgement of no direct or indirect infringement filed by the Moving Dft, Dft IBM, and Dft AOL, 239, 242, 262. Those motions are denied for the reasons expressed in thi…
Length
7 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

At issue are the three motions for summary judgment of no direct or indirect infringement filed by the Moving Defendants, Defendant IBM, and Defendant AOL (##239, 242, and 262). Those motions are denied for the reasons expressed in this order. The plaintiff, Charles E. Hill & Assoc., Inc. (“Hill”), alleges that the defendants infringe various claims of three United States Patents.

Download Opinion (PDF)

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error

Other documents in this case