Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Charles E Hill Assoc v. Amazon.com Inc, et al, No. 2:02-cv-00186 (E.D. Tex. Oct. 7, 2005)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:02-cv-00186, Dkt. No. 405
Decided
October 7, 2005
Judge
T. John Ward, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER - Court issues this memorandum opinion and order to resolve the parties' various claim construction disputes as set forth herein
Length
25 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

The court issues this memorandum opinion and order to resolve the parties’ various claim construction disputes. 1. Introduction. The plaintiff, Charles E. Hill & Assoc., Inc. (“Hill”), asserts various claims of three patents against defendants, operators of Internet-based shopping sites. The patents, related as parent, child, and grandchild, include United States Patent No. 5,528,490 (“the ‘490 patent”), United States Patent No. 5,761,649 (“the ‘649 patent”) and United States Patent No. 56, 049, 142 (“ the ‘142 patent”).