Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Finisar Corporation v. DirecTV Group Inc The et al, No. 1:05-cv-00264 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 4, 2006)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Beaumont Division
Case No.
No. 1:05-cv-00264, Dkt. No. 344
Decided
August 4, 2006
Judge
See opinion
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER re 339 Plaintiff's Bill of Costs. Ordered that pltf Finisar Corporation recover against defts The DirecTV Group Inc, DirecTV Holdings LLC, DirecTV Enterprises LLC, DirecTV Operations LLC, DirecTV Inc and Hughes Network Systems Inc joi…
Length
4 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

re: PLAINTIFF’S BILL OF COSTS Before the court is Plaintiff’s Proposed Bill of Costs [Doc. #339]. Defendants have objected to a number of the requested costs. This case has been litigated heavily by both Plaintiff and Defendants for over one year. The trial lasted two weeks and both Plaintiff and Defendants obviously spent substantial time and money preparing for and trying the case. Defendants first raise the argument that th e costs submitted by Plaintiff should not be granted because Plaintiff is not the prevailing party.