Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Finisar Corporation v. DirecTV Group Inc The et al, No. 1:05-cv-00264 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 28, 2006)

Granted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Beaumont Division
Case No.
No. 1:05-cv-00264, Dkt. No. 93
Decided
March 28, 2006
Judge
Ron Clark, J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER granting 66 Motion for Clarification of the Construction of the Phrase "Downloading into a Memory Storage Device"
Length
4 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Finisar’s Motion a nd Memorandum for Clarification of the Construction of the Phrase “Downloading into a Memory Storage Device” [Doc. #66]. DirecTV has responded. Finisar seeks reconsideration of the Court’s construction of the phrase “downloading into a memory storage device” in three of the five claims in which it appears. The argument Finisar now raises was not made in the papers filed by the parties prior to the claim construction hearing, nor was it made at the h earing itself.