Energy Heating, LLC. v. Heat On-The-Fly, LLC, No. 16-1559 (Fed. Cir. May 4, 2018)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Please make the following changes: ENERGY HEATING, LLC v. HEAT ON-THE-FLY, LLC 2 On page 16, lines 34–35, delete: HOTF did not object Replace the deleted language with: no one objected On page 17, lines 24–27, delete: Energy, however, also called Mr. Lind, who testified that, according to Mr. Kelley, Mr. Lyles had mentioned the patent to Mr. Kelley. HOTF did not object to Mr. Lind’s testimony. Replace the deleted language with: HOTF, however, subsequently called Mr. Lind as an adverse witness.