Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Fed. Cir.

Energy Heating, LLC. v. Heat On-The-Fly, LLC, No. 16-1559 (Fed. Cir. May 4, 2018)

Affirmed in Part
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 16-1559
Also Docketed
No. 16-1893, No. 16-1894 (consolidated; same document)
Decided
May 4, 2018
Judge
Stoll, J.
Document
Precedential Opinion
Length
24 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Appellants Heat On-The-Fly, LLC and Super Heaters North Dakota, LLC (together, “HOTF”) 1 appeal the di s- trict court’s judgment of inequitable conduct , summary judgment of obviousness, denial of judgment as a matter of law of no tortious interference, construction of disputed claim terms, and dismissal of HOTF’s counterclaim of direct infringement .