Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Fed. Cir.

Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. v. NuVasive, Inc., No. 13-1576 (Fed. Cir. June 3, 2016)

Affirmed in Part
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 13-1576
Also Docketed
No. 13-1577 (consolidated; same document)
Decided
June 3, 2016
Judge
Dyk, J.
Document
Precedential Opinion
Length
16 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

This case returns to this court on vacatur and remand from the Supreme Court, “ for further consideration in light of Commil USA, LLC v. Cisco Systems, Inc. , [135 S. Ct. 1920 (2015)].” Medtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc. v. NuVasive, Inc., 136 S. Ct. 893 (2016) (Mem.). On remand, we reaffirm the district court’s judgment with respect to U.S. Patent No. 7,470,236 (“the ’236 patent”) and rei n- state our earlier judgment in other respects. BACKGROUND The vacated decision, Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. v. NuVasive, Inc., 778 F.3d 1365 (Fed. Cir.