Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Fed. Cir.

Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. v. NuVasive, Inc., No. 13-1576 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 2, 2015)

Affirmed in Part
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 13-1576
Decided
March 2, 2015
Judge
Dyk, J.
Document
Precedential Opinion
Length
24 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Warsaw Orthopedic (“Warsaw”) brought suit against NuVasive, Inc. (“ NuVasive”) for infringement of U.S. Patent Nos . 5,860,973 (“the ’973 patent”) and 6,945,933 (“the ’933 patent”). Nu Vasive counterclaimed for i n- fringement of U.S. Patent No. 7,470,236 (“the ’236 p a- tent”) against Warsaw and its related company, Medtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc. (“MSD”). For each of the three patents, t he district court sustained jury fin d- ings of infringement, awarded damages for past infring e- ment, and awarded an ongoing royalty rate. Both parties appealed.