Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Fed. Cir.

Icon Health & Fitness v. Octane Fitness, No. 11-1521 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 26, 2014)

Vacated & Remanded
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 11-1521
Decided
August 26, 2014
Judge
Per curiam
Document
Nonprecedential Opinion
Length
7 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

This case has returned to us on remand from the Su- preme Court of the United States. In its earlier appea r- ance in this court, ICON Health & Fitness, Inc. (“ICON”) appealed from the decision of the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota , which granted sum- mary judgment that two families of elliptical machines sold by Octane Fitness, LLC (“Octane”) did not infringe certain claims of ICON’s U.S. Patent 6,019,710 (the “’710 patent”) (Appeal No. 2011-1521). ICON Health & Fitness, Inc. v. Octane Fitness, LLC , No.