Icon Health & Fitness v. Octane Fitness, No. 11-1521 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 24, 2012)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

ICON Health & Fitness, Inc. (“ICON”) appeals from the final judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota, which granted summary judg- ment of noninfringement of claims 1–5, 7, and 9–10 of U.S. Patent 6,019,710 (the “’710 patent”). ICON Health & Fitness, Inc. v. Octane Fitness, LLC , No. 09-319 ADM/SER, 2011 WL 2457914 ( D. Minn. Jun. 17, 2011) (the “Summary Judgment Op. ”). Octane Fitness, LLC (“Octane”) cross-appeals the court’s denial of a motion to find the case exceptional under § 285.