Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Fed. Cir.

Ultramercial, Inc. v. WildTangent, Inc., No. 10-1544 (Fed. Cir. June 21, 2013)

Reversed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 10-1544
Decided
June 21, 2013
Judge
Rader, C.J.
Document
Precedential Opinion
Length
36 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

The United States District Court for the Central Dis- trict of California dismissed this patent suit, filed by Ultramercial, LLC and Ultramercial, Inc. (collectively, “Ultramercial”), by holding that U.S. Patent No. 7,346,545 (“the ’545 patent”) does not claim patent-eligible subject matter. In an earlier decision, later vacated by the Unit- ed States Supreme Court, this court reversed the district court’s holding and remanded. Ultramercial, LLC v. Hulu, LLC, 657 F.3d 1325 (Fed. Cir. 2011), vacated sub nom. WildTangent, Inc. v.