Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Fed. Cir.

Ultramercial, Inc. v. WildTangent, Inc., No. 10-1544 (Fed. Cir. Sept. 15, 2011)

Reversed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 10-1544
Decided
September 15, 2011
Judge
Rader, C.J.
Document
Precedential Opinion
Length
14 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

The United States District Court for the Central Dis­ trict of California dismissed Ultramercial, LLC and Ultramercial, Inc.'s (collectively, "Ultramercial") patent infringement claims, finding that U.S. Patent No. 7,346,545 ("the '545 patent") does not claim patent-eligible subject matter. Because the '545 patent claims a "proc­ ess" within the language and meaning of 35 U.S.C. § 101, this court reverses and remands.