Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Deep Nines, Inc. v. McAfee Inc et al, No. 9:09-cv-00089 (E.D. Tex. Nov. 10, 2009)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Lufkin Division
Case No.
No. 9:09-cv-00089, Dkt. No. 74
Decided
November 10, 2009
Judge
Ron Clark, J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER denying 15 Defendant Secure Computing Corp.'s Motion to Change Venue
Length
11 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO CHANGE VENUE Plaintiff Deep Nines, Inc. filed suit against Defendants McAfee, Inc. and Secure Computing Corp., alleging that certain products infringe United States Patent Nos. 7,058,976; 6,930,978; and 7,380,272. The ‘976 patent describes a system and method for detecting and preventing attacks on a communications network. The ‘978 patent is a continuation-in-part of the ‘976 patent, and the ‘272 patent is a continuation-in-part of the ‘978 patent.