Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Cummins-Allison Corp v. Shinwoo Information & Telecommunications Co., Ltd. et al, No. 9:07-cv-00196 (E.D. Tex. Nov. 13, 2009)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Lufkin Division
Case No.
No. 9:07-cv-00196, Dkt. No. 223
Decided
November 13, 2009
Judge
Ron Clark, J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
REVISED MEMORANDUM AND ORDER intended to replace the Court's Order 218 filed on 10/30/09
Length
16 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

* Cummins-Allison Corp. (“Cummins”) asserted infringement of four patents dealing with methods and devices for currency denomination and counterfeit detection. At trial Defendants did not contest infringement as to the asserted representative claims of U.S. Patent No. 6,459,806 (“the ‘806 patent”) and U.S. Patent No. 5,966,456 (“the ‘456 patent”). The jury found that the asserted representative claims of U.S. Patent No. 5,909,503 (“the ‘503 patent”) and U.S. Patent No. 6,381,354 (“the ‘354 patent”) were infringed.