Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Candela Corporation, et al v. Palomar Medical Technologies, Inc, No. 9:06-cv-00277 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 6, 2008)

Claims Construed
Claim Construction
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Lufkin Division
Case No.
No. 9:06-cv-00277, Dkt. No. 168
Decided
August 6, 2008
Judge
Keith F. Giblin, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM Opininion and Order construing claim terms of U S Patent NOS 5,810,801; 6,120,497 and 6,659,999
Length
24 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

CONSTRUING CLAIM TERMS OF UNITED STATES PATENT NOS. 5,810,801; 6,120,497; AND 6,659,999 Plaintiff Candela Corporation filed suit against Defendant Palomar Medical1 Technologies, Inc. claiming infringement of United States Patent Nos. 5,810,801 (“the ‘801 patent”); 6,120,497 (“the ‘497 patent”); and 6,659,999 (“the ‘999 patent”). The court conducted a Markman hearing to assist the court in interpreting the meaning of the claim terms of the patents-in-suit.

Download Opinion (PDF)

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error

Other documents in this case