Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

BridgeLux, Inc v. Cree, Inc, No. 9:06-cv-00240 (E.D. Tex. June 3, 2008)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Lufkin Division
Case No.
No. 9:06-cv-00240, Dkt. No. 176
Decided
June 3, 2008
Judge
Keith F. Giblin, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION and order construing claim terms of U S Patent Nos. 6,869,812, 6,6,14,056 and 6,885,036. The jury shall be instructed in accordance with the courts interpretations of the disputed claim terms in the 812, 056, and 036 pate…
Length
26 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

CONSTRUING CLAIM TERMS OF UNITED STATES PATENT NOS. 6,869,812, 6,614,056 AND 6,885,036 Plaintiff BridgeLux, Inc. filed suit against Defendant Cree, Inc. claiming infringement of United States Patent Nos. 6,869,812 (“ the ‘812 patent”). Cree filed counte rclaims alleg ing infringement of United States Patent Nos. 6,614,056 (“the ‘056 patent”) and 6,885,036 (“the ‘036 patent”). All three patents relate to light emitting diodes (LED).