Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Cisco Systems, Inc. et al v. Telcordia Technologies, Inc, No. 9:06-cv-00160 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 10, 2007)

Vacated & Remanded
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Lufkin Division
Case No.
No. 9:06-cv-00160, Dkt. No. 72
Decided
August 10, 2007
Judge
Ron Clark, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
VACATED PER COURT ORDER 111 FILED ON 11/7/08 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER CONSTRUING CLAIM TERMS OF UNITED STATES PATENT NOS. 6,128,656; 6,330,600; 6,628,304
Length
28 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

CONSTRUING CLAIM TERMS OF UNITED STATES PATENT NOS. 6,128,656; 6,330,600; 6,628,304 Plaintiffs Cisco Systems, Inc. and Cisco Technology, Inc. (collectively, “Cisco”) filed suit against Defendant Telcordia Technologies, Inc. (“Telcordia”) claiming infringement of United States Patent Nos. 6,128,656 (“the ‘656 patent”); 6,330,600 (“the ‘600 patent”); and 6,628,304 (“the ‘304 patent”). The court conducted a Markman hearing to assist the court in interpreting the meaning of the claim terms in dispute.