Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Computer Acceleration Corporation v. Microsoft Corporation, No. 9:06-cv-00140 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 24, 2007)

Granted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Lufkin Division
Case No.
No. 9:06-cv-00140, Dkt. No. 127
Decided
August 24, 2007
Judge
Ron Clark, J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER granting Microsoft's 85 Motion to Strike. Ordered that CAC's infringement contention referring to the Vista product and plaintiff's infringement claims against the Vista product are struck
Length
10 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

GRANTING MICROSOFT’S MOTION TO STRIKE PORTION OF PLAINTIFF’S RULE 3-1 INFRINGEMENT CONTENTIONS Defendant Microsoft Corporation (“Microsoft”) seeks to strike Plaintiff Computer Acceleration Corporation’s (“CAC”) infringement contentions related to Microsoft’s Windows Vista (“Vista”) product, for being insufficiently detailed in violation of P.R. 3-1(c) of the Rules of Practice for Patent Cases of the Eastern District of Texas. [Doc.