Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Pressure Products Medical Supplies, Inc v. Greatbatch Ltd, No. 9:06-cv-00121 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 19, 2008)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Lufkin Division
Case No.
No. 9:06-cv-00121, Dkt. No. 89
Decided
March 19, 2008
Judge
Keith F. Giblin, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION and Order construing claim terms of U S Patent NOS 5,125,904 and 5,312,355
Length
29 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

CONSTRUING CLAIM TERMS OF UNITED STATES PATENT NOS. 5,125,904 AND 5,312,355 Plaintiff Pressure Products Medical Supplies, Inc. (“Pressure Products”) filed suit against Defendant Enpath Medical, Inc. (“Enpath”) claiming infringement of United States Patent Nos. 5,125,904 (“the ` 904 patent”) and 5,312,355 (“the ` 355 patent”). The court conducted a Markman hearing to assist the court in interpreting the meaning of the claim terms in dispute.