Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Nike, Inc v. Adidas America Inc et al, No. 9:06-cv-00043 (E.D. Tex. Dec. 18, 2006)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Lufkin Division
Case No.
No. 9:06-cv-00043, Dkt. No. 93
Decided
December 18, 2006
Judge
Ron Clark, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER CONSTRUING CLAIM TERMS OF UNITED STATES PATENT NO. 6,487,796 AND NO. 6,298,314
Length
25 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

CONSTRUING CLAIM TERMS OF UNITED STATES PATENT NO. 6,487,796 AND NO. 6,298,314 Plaintiff Nike, Inc. (“Nike”) filed suit against Defendants adidas America Inc. d/b/a adidas International, adidas Salomon North America, I nc., and adidas Promotion Retail Operations Inc. (collectively “adidas”) claiming infringement of United States Patent No. 6,487,796 (“ the ` 796 patent”) and United States Patent No. 6,298,314 (“the ` 314 patent”) . The c ourt conduc ted a Markman hearing to a ssist the court in interpreting the meaning of the c laim terms in d ispute.