Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Lunar Eye, Inc v. Independent Witness, Inc et al, No. 9:05-cv-00188 (E.D. Tex. Oct. 3, 2006)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Lufkin Division
Case No.
No. 9:05-cv-00188, Dkt. No. 105
Decided
October 3, 2006
Judge
Ron Clark, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER CONSTRUING CLAIM TERMS OF UNITED STATES PATENT NO. 6,484,035. The jury shall be instructed in accordance with the court's interpretation of the disputed claim terms in the ' 035 patent
Length
12 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

CONSTRUING CLAIM TERMS OF UNITED STATES PATENT NO. 6,484,035 Plaintiff LunarEye, Inc. (“LunarEye”) filed suit against Defendants Independent Witness, Inc. ( “IWI”), B P Am erica Pr oduction Co mpany and BP A merica, I nc., (c ollectively “Defendants”) claiming infringement of United States Patent No. 6,484,035 (“the ' 035 patent”). The court conducted a Markman hearing to assist the court in interpreting t he meaning of the claim terms in dispute.