Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Burns Morris & Stewart Limited Partnership v. Masonite International Corporation et al, No. 9:04-cv-00168 (E.D. Tex. Nov. 21, 2005)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Lufkin Division
Case No.
No. 9:04-cv-00168, Dkt. No. 42
Decided
November 21, 2005
Judge
Ron Clark, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER CONSTRUING CLAIM TERM OF US PATENT NO. 5,873,209 . The jury shall be instructed in accordance with the court's interpretation of the disputed claim term in the '209 patent
Length
14 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

CONSTRUING CLAIM TERM OF UNITED STATES PATENT NO. 5,873,209 Plaintiff Burns, Morris & Stewart Limite d Partnership (“BMS”) filed suit claiming infringement of United States Patent No. 5,873,209 (“ the ' 209 patent”). The Parties entered into a stipulation agreeing to adopt the claim construction decision rendered by this court in the matter of Burns, Morris & Stewart Limited Partnership v. Endura Products, Civil Action No. 9:04-cv- 23 [Doc.