Cypress Lake Software, Inc. v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc., No. 6:18-cv-00030 (E.D. Tex. May 10, 2019)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

ON CLAIM CONSTRUCTION On March 14, 2019, the Court held a hearing to determine th e proper construction of the disputed claim terms in United States Patent Nos. 8,661,361 (“the ’361 Patent”), 9,423,938 (“the ’938 Patent”), 9,423,923 (“the ’923 Patent”), 9,841,878 (“the ’878 Patent”), 9,823,838 (“the ’838 Patent”), 9,870,145 (“the ’145 Patent”), 9,423 ,954 (“the ’954 Patent”), 8,781,299 (“the ’299 Patent”), 8,983,264 (“the ’264 Patent”), 9,871,558 (“the ’558 Patent”), and 8,787,731 (“the ’731 Patent”) (collectively, “the Asserted Patents”).