Parity Networks, LLC v. Ericsson, Inc., No. 6:17-cv-00526 (E.D. Tex. Jan. 28, 2019)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

T his Memorandum Opinion and Order construes the disputed claim terms in United States Patent Nos. 7,468,978 (“the ‘978 Patent”), 6,643,287 (“the ‘287 Patent), 6,763,394 (“the ‘394 Patent), 7,107,352 (“the ‘352 Patent”), and 6,870,844 (“the ‘844 Patent) asserted in this suit by Parity Networks, LLC (“Plaintiff”) against Defendants. 1 On December 6, 2018, the parties presented oral arguments on the disputed claim terms at a Markman hearing. For the reasons stated herein, the Court ADOPTS the constructions set forth below.