Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

JumpSport, Inc. v. Academy, Ltd dba Academy Sports & Outdoors, No. 6:17-cv-00414 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 28, 2018)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division
Case No.
No. 6:17-cv-00414, Dkt. No. 171
Decided
August 28, 2018
Judge
John D. Love, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. The Court adopts the constructions set forth in this Order
Length
28 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

This claim construction opinion construes the disputed cl aim terms in U.S. Patent No s. 6,053,845 (“the ’845 Patent”) and 6,261,207 (“the ’207 Patent”). Plaintiff JumpSport, Inc. (“JumpSport” or “Plaintiff”) alleges Defendants Academy, Ltd., d/b/a A cademy Sports + Outdoors; Amazon.com, Inc.; Amazon.com LLC; Dick’s Sporting Goods, Inc.; American Sports Licensing, LLC, f/k/a American Sports Licensing, Inc.; Dick’s Merchandising & Supply Chain, Inc.; Wal -Mart Stores, Inc.