Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Cypress Lake Software, Inc. v. ZTE (USA) Inc., No. 6:17-cv-00300 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 23, 2018)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division
Case No.
No. 6:17-cv-00300, Dkt. No. 123
Decided
August 23, 2018
Judge
Robert W. Schroeder, III, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ON CLAIM CONSTRUCTION
Length
67 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

ON CLAIM CONSTRUCTION On August 8, 2018, the Court held a hearing to determine the proper construction of the disputed claim terms in United States Patent Nos. 8,661,361 (“the ’361 Patent”), 8,781,299 (“the ’299 Patent”), 8,983,264 (“the ’ 264 Patent”), 9,871,558 (“the ’558 Patent”), and 9,423,954 (“the ’954 Patent”). The Court has considered the arguments made by the parties at the hearing and in their claim construction briefs. Docket Nos.