Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Blue Spike, LLC v. Asus Computer International, Inc. et al, No. 6:16-cv-01384 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 23, 2018)

Adopted Report and recommendation (or magistrate's order) adopted
General / Procedural
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division
Case No.
No. 6:16-cv-01384, Dkt. No. 42
Decided
March 23, 2018
Judge
Robert W. Schroeder, III, J.
Document
Report and Recommendation
Docket Entry
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 37 Report and Recommendations, and denying as moot 26 Motion to Strike, filed by Blue Spike, LLC, denying-in-part on the merits and denying-in-part as moot 11 Motion for Default Judgment, filed …
Length
9 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (the “Report”) (Docket No. 37) in which Judge Mitchell addressed three pending motions: (1) Plaintiff Blue Spike LLC ’s Motion for Default Judgment as to ASUS Computer International (“ASUS”) and ASUSTeK Computer Inc. (“ASUSTek”) (Docket No. 11); (2) ASUSTeK’s Motion to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, Motion to Quash Service of Summons and Complaint (Docket No. 16); and, (3) Plaintiff’s Motion to Strike for failure to comply with L.R. CV-7(a) (Docket No. 26).

Download Opinion (PDF)

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error