Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Blue Spike, LLC v. Caterpillar, Inc. et al, No. 6:16-cv-01361 (E.D. Tex. May 8, 2017)

Adopted Report and recommendation (or magistrate's order) adopted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division
Case No.
No. 6:16-cv-01361, Dkt. No. 71
Decided
May 8, 2017
Judge
Robert W. Schroeder, III, J.
Document
Report and Recommendation
Docket Entry
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 43 Report and Recommendations. It is ORDERED that 17 Motion to Dismiss filed by Caterpillar, Inc. is converted to a motion for summary judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(d) a…
Length
5 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Magistrate Judge John D. Love’s Report and Recommendation (the “Report”) (Docket No. 43), which recommends that Defendant Caterpillar Inc.’s (“Caterpillar”) Motion to Dismiss (Docket No. 17) be converted to a motion for summary judgment and granted, and that Plaintiff Blue Spike LLC’s (“Blue Spike”) claims against Caterpillar be dismissed with prejudice. Report at 1. The Report also finds that an award of fees may be appropriate under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11(b)(3).