Blue Spike, LLC v. Contixo Inc. et al, No. 6:16-cv-01220 (E.D. Tex. July 26, 2017)
From the Opinion
The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.
Before the Court is Defendant Visual Land, Inc.’s (“Visual Land”) Motion to Dismiss for Improper Venue. (Doc. No. 34.) Blue Spike, LLC (“Blue Spike”) has filed a Response (Doc. No. 37), Visual Land has filed a Reply (Doc. No. 40) and Blue Spike has filed a Sur-Reply (Doc. No. 43).1 On October 11, 2016 , Blue Spike filed the above-captioned action against Visual Land and a number of other defendants for patent infringement. (Doc. No. 1.) By February 23, 2017, Blue Spike had voluntarily dismissed all of the defendants in the case except for Visual Land.
Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error