Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Blue Spike, LLC v. Contixo Inc. et al, No. 6:16-cv-01220 (E.D. Tex. July 26, 2017)

Granted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division
Case No.
No. 6:16-cv-01220, Dkt. No. 48
Decided
July 26, 2017
Judge
John D. Love, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION, and ORDER GRANTING 34 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Visual Land Inc. By this Order, the Court WITHDRAWS the Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 47) and replaces it with this Memorandum Opinion and Order
Length
7 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendant Visual Land, Inc.’s (“Visual Land”) Motion to Dismiss for Improper Venue. (Doc. No. 34.) Blue Spike, LLC (“Blue Spike”) has filed a Response (Doc. No. 37), Visual Land has filed a Reply (Doc. No. 40) and Blue Spike has filed a Sur-Reply (Doc. No. 43).1 On October 11, 2016 , Blue Spike filed the above-captioned action against Visual Land and a number of other defendants for patent infringement. (Doc. No. 1.) By February 23, 2017, Blue Spike had voluntarily dismissed all of the defendants in the case except for Visual Land.