Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

MacroPoint, LLC v. Ruiz Food Products, Inc., No. 6:16-cv-01133 (E.D. Tex. Feb. 14, 2018)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division
Case No.
No. 6:16-cv-01133, Dkt. No. 75
Decided
February 14, 2018
Judge
K. Nicole Mitchell, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
rlf)MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER construing the disputed claim terms in United States Patent Nos. 8,275,358 ("the '358 Patent") and 9,429,659 ("the '659 Patent")
Length
21 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

This Memorandum Opinion construes the disputed claim terms in United States Patent Nos. 8, 275,358 (“the ‘358 Patent”) and 9, 429,659 (“the ‘ 659 Patent”) asserted in this suit by MacroPoint, LLC. On September 28, 2017, the parties presented oral arguments on the disputed claim terms at a Markman hearing. For the reasons stated herein, the court ADOPTS the constructions set forth below. BACKGROUND Plaintiff, MacroPoint, LLC (“ MacroPoint”) alleges that Defendant infringes the ‘358 Patent and the ‘659 Patent (collectively, the “patents-in-suit”).