Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Iridescent Networks, Inc. v. AT&T, Inc. et al, No. 6:16-cv-01003 (E.D. Tex. July 18, 2017)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division
Case No.
No. 6:16-cv-01003, Dkt. No. 162
Decided
July 18, 2017
Judge
John D. Love, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. The Court adopts the constructions as set forth in this Order
Length
19 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

This claim construction opinion construes the disputed claim terms in United States Patent No. 8,036,119 (“the ’119 Patent”). Plaintiff Iridescent Networks, Inc. (“ Plaintiff”) alleges that Defendant AT&T Mobility, LLC (“AT& T”) and Defendant -Intervenor Ericsson Inc. (“Ericsson”) infringe certain claims of the ’119 Patent . Plaintiff filed an opening claim construction brief (Doc. No. 119), to which Defendants filed a responsive brief (Doc. No. 128), and Plaintiff filed a repl y (Doc. No. 131).