Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

T-Rex Property AB v. Regal Entertainment Group, No. 6:16-cv-00927 (E.D. Tex. Feb. 20, 2018)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division
Case No.
No. 6:16-cv-00927, Dkt. No. 104
Decided
February 20, 2018
Judge
K. Nicole Mitchell, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER construing the disputed claim terms in United States Patent Nos. RE39,470; 7,382,334; and 6,430,603
Length
35 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

This Memorandum Opinion construes the disputed claim terms 1 in United States Patent Nos. RE39,470 (“the ‘470 Patent”), 7,382,334 (“the ‘ 334 Patent”), and 6,430,603 (“the ‘603 Patent”) (collectively, “the patents -in-suit”) asserted in this suit by T- Rex Property AB (“Plaintiff”) against Defendants.2 On December 7, 2017, the parties presented oral arguments on the disputed claim terms at a Markman hearing. For the reasons stated herein, the court ADOPTS the constructions set forth below.