Cellular Communications Equipment LLC v. HTC Corporation et al, No. 6:16-cv-00475 (E.D. Tex. Jan. 8, 2018)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

This Memorandum Opinion construes the disputed claim terms in Uni ted States Patent Nos. 8,385,966 (“the ’966 Patent”) and 9,037,129 (“the ’129 Patent”) asserted in this suit by Plaintiff Cellular Communications Equipment LLC (“CCE”) against Defendants HTC Corporation, HTC America, Inc., and ZTE (USA), Inc. (collectively, “Defendants”). On September 14, 2017, the parties presented oral arguments on the disputed claim terms at a Markman hearing. For the reasons stated herein, the court ADOPTS the constructions set forth below.