Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

S3G Technology LLC v. UniKey Technologies, Inc., No. 6:16-cv-00400 (E.D. Tex. Nov. 1, 2017)

Adopted Report and recommendation (or magistrate's order) adopted
Indefiniteness Claim Construction
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division
Case No.
No. 6:16-cv-00400, Dkt. No. 91
Decided
November 1, 2017
Judge
Robert W. Schroeder, III, J.
Document
Report and Recommendation
Docket Entry
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS of the United States Magistrate Judge for 74 Report and Recommendations. Accordingly, Defendants Motion for Partial Summary Judgment of Invalidity Due to Indefiniteness is DENIED
Length
4 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court are Defendant’s objections to the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (Docket No. 74) regarding the disputed claim terms in United States Patent Nos. 8,572,571 (“the ‘571 Patent”), 9,081,897 (“the ‘897 Patent”) and 9,304,758 (“the ‘758 Patent”) (collectively, “Asserted Patents”) and regarding Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment of Invalidity Under 35 U.S.C. § 112, ¶ 6. Having re viewed the written objections de novo, Defendant’s objections are OVERRULED.

Download Opinion (PDF)

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error