Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Papst Licensing GmbH & Co., KG v. Apple, Inc., No. 6:15-cv-01095 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 7, 2017)

Claims Construed
Claim Construction
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division
Case No.
No. 6:15-cv-01095, Dkt. No. 275
Decided
March 7, 2017
Judge
Robert W. Schroeder, III, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER construing disputed claim terms in U.S. Patent Nos. 6,470,399, 6,895,449, 8,504,746, 8,966,144 and 9,189,437
Length
52 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

This Memorandum Opinion construes disputed claim terms in U.S. Patent Nos. 6,470,399 (“the ’399 Patent”), 6,895,449 (“the ’449 Patent”), 8,504,746 (“the ’746 Patent”), 8,966,144 (“the ’144 Patent”), and 9,189,437 (“the ’437 Patent”) (collectively, the “patents-in-suit”) asserted by Plaintiff Papst Licensing GmbH & Co., KG (“Plaintiff”) against Defendants Apple Inc. (“Apple”), Lenovo (United States) Inc.

Download Opinion (PDF)

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error