Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Dbez Firenze LLC v. PLR IP Holdings, LLC et al, No. 6:15-cv-00974 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 27, 2016)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division
Case No.
No. 6:15-cv-00974, Dkt. No. 174
Decided
September 27, 2016
Judge
John D. Love, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. The Court adopts the constructions as set forth in this Order
Length
28 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

This claim construction opinion construes s o m e o f the disputed claim terms1 in U.S. Patent No. 6,850,647 (“the ’647 Patent”), U.S. Patent No. 7,489,824 (“the ’824 Patent”), U.S. Patent No. 7,627,183 (“the ’183 Patent”), U.S. Patent No. 6,690,731 (“the ’731 Patent”), and U.S. Patent No. 8,179,971 (“the ’971 Patent”). Plaintiff VStream Technologies , LLC alleges that Defendants infringe the asserted patents . Plaintiff filed an Opening Claim Construction Brief (Doc. No. 130 ), to which Defendants2 filed a Response (Doc. No.