Rapid Completions LLC v. Baker Hughes Incorporated et al, No. 6:15-cv-00724 (E.D. Tex. June 21, 2016)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court are Defendant Weatherford’s Motion to Strike Plaintiff’s Infringement Contentions (Doc. No. 122) and Defendants Baker Hughes and Pegasi’s Motion to Compel Amended Infringement Contentions or, Alternatively to Strike Rapid Completions’ Infringement Contentions (Doc. No . 131) . For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS-IN-PART both motions. BACKGROUND Plaintiff Rapid Completions filed suit on July 31, 2015 alleging patent infringement. Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint alleges infringement of U.S. Patent Nos.