Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Rothschild Location Technologies LLC v. Geotab USA, Inc., No. 6:15-cv-00682 (E.D. Tex. Dec. 5, 2016)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division
Case No.
No. 6:15-cv-00682, Dkt. No. 132
Decided
December 5, 2016
Judge
Robert W. Schroeder, III, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. The Court DENIES Rothschild's Motion for Reconsideration 122 and Motion for Leave to File Supplement Rule 60 Motion for Reconsideration 126. The Court's Final Judgment issued on 5-20-2016 stands
Length
17 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

On January 4, 2016, Magistrate Judge John D. Love issued a Report a nd Recommendation (Doc. No. 93) recommending that Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss for Failure 3 to State a Claim (Doc. No. 32 , 64) be granted because the claims u nder U.S. Patent No. 8,606,503 (“the ’503 Patent”) are not patentable subject matter in accordance with 35 U.S.C. § 101. On May 20, 2016, the undersigned adopted the Magistrate Judge’s Report (Doc. No.