Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Chrimar Systems, Inc. et al v. TP-Link USA Corporation, No. 6:15-cv-00641 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 28, 2016)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division
Case No.
No. 6:15-cv-00641, Dkt. No. 28
Decided
March 28, 2016
Judge
John D. Love, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION, and ORDER DENYING 22 Opposed MOTION to Change Venue to the Northern District of California filed by TP-Link USA Corporation
Length
13 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendant TP -Link USA Corporation’s (“TP-Link”) Motion to Transfer Venue Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1404(a). (Doc. No. 22.) Plaintiffs Chrimar Systems, Inc. and Chrimar Holding Company, LLC (“Chrimar”) filed a response (Doc. No. 23) to which TP- Link filed a reply (Doc. No. 24), and Chrimar filed a sur -reply (Doc. No. 27). After considering the parties’ arguments, the Court DENIES TP Link’s Motion to Transfer Venue (Doc. No. 22).